header-logo header-logo

Police apologise for failing to protect domestic abuse victim

15 September 2021
Issue: 7948 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail
The Chief Constable of West Midlands Police has issued a public apology eight years after officers dismissed the murder of a Birmingham mother killed by her partner as a drugs overdose

Suzanne Van Hagen was found dead at home by her nine-year-old daughter on 8 February 2013. Despite initially telling the family Van Hagen had been murdered by her partner, John Worton, who was also found dead at the property, West Midlands Police later issued a press release saying her death was believed to be due to an accidental overdose.

Van Hagen’s family pursued legal action.

They claimed the police failed to take effective action despite receiving eight reports of domestic abuse prior to Van Hagen’s death. A West Midlands Police Professional Standards report later found the police response ‘very poor, inadequate…did not take this domestic violence seriously’.

A police review of the investigation also found the Senior Investigating Officer took as fact a suggestion from a pathologist that marks around Van Hagen’s neck might be linked to a sex game. This was subsequently shown not to be true. In 2019, the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority concluded the marks were caused by a crime of violence which caused or contributed to her death.

The charity Advocacy After Fatal Domestic Abuse helped the family secure a Domestic Homicide Review, which concluded Van Hagen’s death may have been prevented had ‘more positive and joined up intervention, understanding of the nature of domestic violence/coercive control…taken place’.

West Midlands Police has now admitted liability and agreed to pay compensation to the family for police failings in the case.

Sarah Ricca, partner at Deighton Pierce Glynn, which acted for the family, said: ‘This is a truly shocking case that starkly highlights the institutional discrimination women continue to face from the police in relation to domestic violence.’

Issue: 7948 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll