header-logo header-logo

13 November 2019 / Sinead O’Callaghan
Issue: 7864 / Categories: Opinion , Company , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Political advertising: going off message?

Sinead O’Callaghan considers the ramifications of breaching the Companies Act when directors opt to further their own political agenda

JD Wetherspoon has been accused of breaching the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006) after failing to seek shareholder approval for spending on pro-Brexit messaging ahead of the 2016 referendum.

Chairman Tim Martin reportedly used company funds to finance over £90,000 worth of pro-Brexit material. In doing so, Mr Martin is likely to have been in breach of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006) because pursuant to s 366 of CA 2006, political expenditure must be authorised (in the case of a company that is not a subsidiary of another company) by a resolution of the members prior to the political expenditure being incurred. 

The definition of political expenditure is found in s 365 and is expenditure incurred by a company on:

‘(a) the preparation, publication or dissemination of advertising or other promotional or publicity material (i) of whatever nature; and (ii) however published or otherwise disseminated, that at the time  of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll