header-logo header-logo

Political advertising: going off message?

13 November 2019 / Sinead O’Callaghan
Issue: 7864 / Categories: Opinion , Company , Brexit
printer mail-detail
Sinead O’Callaghan considers the ramifications of breaching the Companies Act when directors opt to further their own political agenda

JD Wetherspoon has been accused of breaching the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006) after failing to seek shareholder approval for spending on pro-Brexit messaging ahead of the 2016 referendum.

Chairman Tim Martin reportedly used company funds to finance over £90,000 worth of pro-Brexit material. In doing so, Mr Martin is likely to have been in breach of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006) because pursuant to s 366 of CA 2006, political expenditure must be authorised (in the case of a company that is not a subsidiary of another company) by a resolution of the members prior to the political expenditure being incurred. 

The definition of political expenditure is found in s 365 and is expenditure incurred by a company on:

‘(a) the preparation, publication or dissemination of advertising or other promotional or publicity material (i) of whatever nature; and (ii) however published or otherwise disseminated, that at the time  of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DAC Beachcroft—Ben Daniels

DAC Beachcroft—Ben Daniels

Firm elects new senior partner to lead next phase of growth

Taylor Rose—Amarjit Ryatt

Taylor Rose—Amarjit Ryatt

Partner appointed head of family and divorce

Browne Jacobson—Adam Berry & Adam Culy

Browne Jacobson—Adam Berry & Adam Culy

Financial and professional risks team expand with dual partner hire

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll