header-logo header-logo

Political advertising: going off message?

13 November 2019 / Sinead O’Callaghan
Issue: 7864 / Categories: Opinion , Company , Brexit
printer mail-detail
Sinead O’Callaghan considers the ramifications of breaching the Companies Act when directors opt to further their own political agenda

JD Wetherspoon has been accused of breaching the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006) after failing to seek shareholder approval for spending on pro-Brexit messaging ahead of the 2016 referendum.

Chairman Tim Martin reportedly used company funds to finance over £90,000 worth of pro-Brexit material. In doing so, Mr Martin is likely to have been in breach of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006) because pursuant to s 366 of CA 2006, political expenditure must be authorised (in the case of a company that is not a subsidiary of another company) by a resolution of the members prior to the political expenditure being incurred. 

The definition of political expenditure is found in s 365 and is expenditure incurred by a company on:

‘(a) the preparation, publication or dissemination of advertising or other promotional or publicity material (i) of whatever nature; and (ii) however published or otherwise disseminated, that at the time  of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll