header-logo header-logo

The politics of Panama

22 April 2016
Issue: 7695 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

In the wake of the Panama Papers leak, HMRC has launched a consultation on proposals to make companies criminally liable for failing to prevent tax evasion.

The consultation, Tackling tax evasion, concerns draft legislation published in December. The legislation would make it an offence for a company to fail to take adequate measures to prevent their agents from committing or helping to commit tax evasion in the UK or overseas. The consultation ends on 10 July.

Andrew Smith, partner at Corker Binning, says: “To be clear, the draft law is not a means by which the government could seek the prosecution of those implicated in the Panama Papers.

“The law would, for example, have no application whatsoever to the type of offshore investment scheme which David Cameron’s father managed. The law does not expand the definition of tax evasion under UK law, nor does it criminalise what some regard as immoral tax avoidance. However, the timing of the consultation is no doubt calculated to deflect the current waves of criticism concerning the government’s broader approach to combating tax fraud. Businesses can take limited comfort from the fact that the consultation emphasises that they need only act proportionately to the risks arising in their sectors, so as to develop compliance procedures which are reasonable rather than all-encompassing.”

Meanwhile, writing in this week’s NLJ, expert tax counsel Peter Vaines has denounced the calls for politicians to disclose their tax returns as an “absurd” response to the Panama Papers disclosure: “It is interesting that the focus has not been on those who have been hiding the proceeds of crime or corruption but on people who have put their funds in Panama and have paid all proper taxes which are due...The concern should be with bringing to account those who have broken the law rather than focusing on those people who have not.”

Issue: 7695 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll