header-logo header-logo

22 April 2016
Issue: 7695 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The politics of Panama

In the wake of the Panama Papers leak, HMRC has launched a consultation on proposals to make companies criminally liable for failing to prevent tax evasion.

The consultation, Tackling tax evasion, concerns draft legislation published in December. The legislation would make it an offence for a company to fail to take adequate measures to prevent their agents from committing or helping to commit tax evasion in the UK or overseas. The consultation ends on 10 July.

Andrew Smith, partner at Corker Binning, says: “To be clear, the draft law is not a means by which the government could seek the prosecution of those implicated in the Panama Papers.

“The law would, for example, have no application whatsoever to the type of offshore investment scheme which David Cameron’s father managed. The law does not expand the definition of tax evasion under UK law, nor does it criminalise what some regard as immoral tax avoidance. However, the timing of the consultation is no doubt calculated to deflect the current waves of criticism concerning the government’s broader approach to combating tax fraud. Businesses can take limited comfort from the fact that the consultation emphasises that they need only act proportionately to the risks arising in their sectors, so as to develop compliance procedures which are reasonable rather than all-encompassing.”

Meanwhile, writing in this week’s NLJ, expert tax counsel Peter Vaines has denounced the calls for politicians to disclose their tax returns as an “absurd” response to the Panama Papers disclosure: “It is interesting that the focus has not been on those who have been hiding the proceeds of crime or corruption but on people who have put their funds in Panama and have paid all proper taxes which are due...The concern should be with bringing to account those who have broken the law rather than focusing on those people who have not.”

Issue: 7695 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll