header-logo header-logo

08 April 2022 / Sir Robin Knowles
Issue: 7974 / Categories: Opinion , Covid-19 , Housing
printer mail-detail

Cross-sector initiatives

77716
Cross-sector initiatives on possession may have brought about a culture change post-pandemic, says Sir Robin Knowles

Residential possession proceedings involve lives and families. They also involve pensions, markets and more. By 2019, across England and Wales the legal system found itself dealing with over 11,000 claims a month to repossess homes. Then, in early 2020, the pandemic struck.

Serious at any time, the seriousness of possession claims doubled with the implications of homelessness in a pandemic—in human terms, in public health terms, and in terms of overwhelming pressure on local authorities. Then there were the serious economic and other consequences for lenders and landlords and to the market.

What happened next and where are we now?

Unprecedented teamwork

In March 2020, an immediate stay was imposed on existing and new claims. But who knew then the course of the pandemic? The longer the stay continued, the greater the danger that when it ended, a backlog would overwhelm the system.

At pre-pandemic rates, a six-month stay could accrue a backlog of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll