header-logo header-logo

Cross-sector initiatives

08 April 2022 / Sir Robin Knowles
Issue: 7974 / Categories: Opinion , Covid-19 , Housing
printer mail-detail
77716
Cross-sector initiatives on possession may have brought about a culture change post-pandemic, says Sir Robin Knowles

Residential possession proceedings involve lives and families. They also involve pensions, markets and more. By 2019, across England and Wales the legal system found itself dealing with over 11,000 claims a month to repossess homes. Then, in early 2020, the pandemic struck.

Serious at any time, the seriousness of possession claims doubled with the implications of homelessness in a pandemic—in human terms, in public health terms, and in terms of overwhelming pressure on local authorities. Then there were the serious economic and other consequences for lenders and landlords and to the market.

What happened next and where are we now?

Unprecedented teamwork

In March 2020, an immediate stay was imposed on existing and new claims. But who knew then the course of the pandemic? The longer the stay continued, the greater the danger that when it ended, a backlog would overwhelm the system.

At pre-pandemic rates, a six-month stay could accrue a backlog of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll