header-logo header-logo

08 April 2022 / Sir Robin Knowles
Issue: 7974 / Categories: Opinion , Covid-19 , Housing
printer mail-detail

Cross-sector initiatives

77716
Cross-sector initiatives on possession may have brought about a culture change post-pandemic, says Sir Robin Knowles

Residential possession proceedings involve lives and families. They also involve pensions, markets and more. By 2019, across England and Wales the legal system found itself dealing with over 11,000 claims a month to repossess homes. Then, in early 2020, the pandemic struck.

Serious at any time, the seriousness of possession claims doubled with the implications of homelessness in a pandemic—in human terms, in public health terms, and in terms of overwhelming pressure on local authorities. Then there were the serious economic and other consequences for lenders and landlords and to the market.

What happened next and where are we now?

Unprecedented teamwork

In March 2020, an immediate stay was imposed on existing and new claims. But who knew then the course of the pandemic? The longer the stay continued, the greater the danger that when it ended, a backlog would overwhelm the system.

At pre-pandemic rates, a six-month stay could accrue a backlog of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
back-to-top-scroll