header-logo header-logo

22 May 2008 / Andrew Keogh
Issue: 7322 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Power sharing

The elevation of associate prosecutors is not the end of the world, says Andrew Keogh

The Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill passed into law on 8 May 2008. Section 55 of that Act, entitled “Extension of powers of non-legal staff” heralds one of the most significant shifts in rights of audience since the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 came into force.

Section 55 marks the next stage for designated caseworkers giving them the right to conduct a much wider range of hearings in the magistrates' court, including some summary trials. In three years' time associate prosecutors as they will henceforth be titled will be regulated and it is only a matter of time before all summary proceedings can be undertaken.

During the passage of the Bill the response from the Bar Council and Law Society was somewhat predictable, and consistent with their duty to protect their own members. When you tear away the rhetoric, however, there was and is no substance at all in the self-serving battle that took place during

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll