header-logo header-logo

Power sharing

22 May 2008 / Andrew Keogh
Issue: 7322 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

The elevation of associate prosecutors is not the end of the world, says Andrew Keogh

The Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill passed into law on 8 May 2008. Section 55 of that Act, entitled “Extension of powers of non-legal staff” heralds one of the most significant shifts in rights of audience since the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 came into force.

Section 55 marks the next stage for designated caseworkers giving them the right to conduct a much wider range of hearings in the magistrates' court, including some summary trials. In three years' time associate prosecutors as they will henceforth be titled will be regulated and it is only a matter of time before all summary proceedings can be undertaken.

During the passage of the Bill the response from the Bar Council and Law Society was somewhat predictable, and consistent with their duty to protect their own members. When you tear away the rhetoric, however, there was and is no substance at all in the self-serving battle that took place during

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll