header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
22 May 2008 / Andrew Keogh
Issue: 7322 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Power sharing

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

The elevation of associate prosecutors is not the end of the world, says Andrew Keogh

The Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill passed into law on 8 May 2008. Section 55 of that Act, entitled “Extension of powers of non-legal staff” heralds one of the most significant shifts in rights of audience since the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 came into force.

Section 55 marks the next stage for designated caseworkers giving them the right to conduct a much wider range of hearings in the magistrates' court, including some summary trials. In three years' time associate prosecutors as they will henceforth be titled will be regulated and it is only a matter of time before all summary proceedings can be undertaken.

During the passage of the Bill the response from the Bar Council and Law Society was somewhat predictable, and consistent with their duty to protect their own members. When you tear away the rhetoric, however, there was and is no substance at all in the self-serving battle that took place during

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll