header-logo header-logo

22 May 2008 / Andrew Keogh
Issue: 7322 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Power sharing

The elevation of associate prosecutors is not the end of the world, says Andrew Keogh

The Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill passed into law on 8 May 2008. Section 55 of that Act, entitled “Extension of powers of non-legal staff” heralds one of the most significant shifts in rights of audience since the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 came into force.

Section 55 marks the next stage for designated caseworkers giving them the right to conduct a much wider range of hearings in the magistrates' court, including some summary trials. In three years' time associate prosecutors as they will henceforth be titled will be regulated and it is only a matter of time before all summary proceedings can be undertaken.

During the passage of the Bill the response from the Bar Council and Law Society was somewhat predictable, and consistent with their duty to protect their own members. When you tear away the rhetoric, however, there was and is no substance at all in the self-serving battle that took place during

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll