header-logo header-logo

PPI scandal looms large

11 April 2018
Issue: 7788 / Categories: Legal News , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has threatened regulatory action against any law firms that take on payment protection insurance (PPI) claims that people could have conducted themselves. The warning comes this week as an SRA review on PPI reveals that 80% of firms doing PPI claims work routinely charge fees of more than 25% of the redress they receive, with some charging up to 50%. The SRA considers charging more than 15% unreasonable. Paul Philip, SRA chief executive, said firms unable to demonstrate that they are acting in the best interest of their clients could be subject to regulatory action.

Issue: 7788 / Categories: Legal News , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll