header-logo header-logo

27 March 2015
Issue: 7646 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Practice

Liberty Investing Ltd v Sydow and others [2015] EWHC 608 (Comm), [2015] All ER (D) 169 (Mar)

The first defendant in the proceedings, S, applied to be removed as a defendant. He contended that a shareholders’ agreement at the heart of the proceedings did not affect him, as he had not been a shareholder. The Commercial Court held that, on the true construction of the agreement, it was appropriate to remove S as a party.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Simone Ketchell

Browne Jacobson—Simone Ketchell

Browne Jacobson adds top property litigation Partner in record real estate expansion

Fieldfisher—Megan Goodyer

Fieldfisher—Megan Goodyer

Fieldfisher expands Personal Injury team with impressive partner from Stewarts

Clyde & Co—Jack Holling

Clyde & Co—Jack Holling

Global firm strengthens insurance practice with appointment of partner

NEWS
Should every solicitor found to have acted dishonestly face automatic striking off? The answer, argues John Gould, chair of Russell-Cooke LLP in NLJ this week, is no 
Winning an arbitral award against a state is one thing; enforcing it is another
Can government success in court tell us whether the rule of law is healthy? 
Poorly drafted dispute resolution clauses can trigger litigation before the real dispute is even addressed
As cryptocurrency becomes mainstream, family lawyers are increasingly confronting the challenges it creates on divorce
back-to-top-scroll