header-logo header-logo

27 March 2015
Issue: 7646 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Practice

Liberty Investing Ltd v Sydow and others [2015] EWHC 608 (Comm), [2015] All ER (D) 169 (Mar)

The first defendant in the proceedings, S, applied to be removed as a defendant. He contended that a shareholders’ agreement at the heart of the proceedings did not affect him, as he had not been a shareholder. The Commercial Court held that, on the true construction of the agreement, it was appropriate to remove S as a party.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Sara Mason

Bellevue Law—Sara Mason

Bellevue Law expands workplace law offering with specialist healthcare regulatory appointment

Seddons GSC—Peter Ames

Seddons GSC—Peter Ames

Seddons GSC strengthens Dispute Resolution team with partner hire

Taylor Rose—four promotions

Taylor Rose—four promotions

Taylor Rose announces partner promotions

NEWS
Pressure is mounting for a dedicated UK AI law, but deciding what it should achieve remains the central challenge
Legal professional privilege has checked the SRA’s investigative powers, exposing difficult questions about tackling suspected abusive litigation
Refusing mediation need not trigger a costs penalty, but litigators must justify their position
Group claims, disputed costs and judicial recruitment dominate the latest courtroom round-up
Landlords face fresh registration duties as procedural reforms reshape the civil courts
back-to-top-scroll