Holyoake and another v Candy and others [2016] All ER (D) 213 (Apr)
The Chancery Division ruled that account would not be taken of evidence concerning the risk of dissipation, which was filed by the defendants following its earlier judgment granting the claimants a notification injunction. The court held that the notification regime would be continued with certain modifications and it fortified the injunction in the sum of £5m, having been satisfied that the notification regime, which had been put in place, had operated in a way which had caused real practical difficulties for the defendants.
