Practice

The Court of Appeal allowed the defendants’ appeal against two judges’ decisions imposing interim and modified notification injunctions, as the first judge had applied an incorrect test in relation to risk of dissipation. It further allowed their appeal against the second judge’s decision, that the claimants’ insurance policy had been satisfactory fortification of their cross-undertaking in damages, as he had erred in having found that the policy had been in a form reasonably satisfactory to the defendants.