header-logo header-logo

14 April 2017
Issue: 7742 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Practice

PP v Home Office and another [2017] EWHC 663 (QB), [2017] All ER (D) 18 (Apr)

The Queen’s Bench Division made a number of preliminary rulings in a case concerning a claimant who alleged that the defendant Home Office and Secretary of State for the Home Department had failed to make reasonable enquiries as to whether the claimant had been a victim of trafficking and had also unlawfully detained the claimant as a consequence of alleged errors of law relating to the identification of the claimant as a victim of trafficking.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DAC Beachcroft—Clare Dewar

DAC Beachcroft—Clare Dewar

DAC Beachcroft strengthens Scottish real estate capabilitywith partner appointment

Womble Bond Dickinson—Brendan Ryan

Womble Bond Dickinson—Brendan Ryan

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints Brendan Ryan as partner in Public Law Projects team

Parklane Plowden Chambers—five appointments

Parklane Plowden Chambers—five appointments

Parklane Plowden Chambers welcomes five new barristers

NEWS
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
Police powers targeting concealed identities at protests come with procedural conditions that could determine whether prosecutions succeed
back-to-top-scroll