header-logo header-logo

14 July 2011
Issue: 7474 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Practice and procedure

Russian Commercial Bank (Cyprus) Ltd v Khoroshilov and others [2011] EWHC 1721 (Comm), [2011] All ER (D) 35 (Jul)

It was settled law that the scope of the duty of disclosure of a party applying for injunctive relief was, in broad terms agreed between the parties. An applicant had to show the utmost faith and disclose his case fully and fairly.

If the court found that there had been breaches of the duty of full and fair disclosure on an ex parte application, the general rule was that it should discharge the order obtained in breach and refuse to renew the order until trial. Notwithstanding that general rule, the court had jurisdiction to continue or re-grant the order. The court had a “single discretion” to be exercised in accordance with all the circumstances of the case.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll