header-logo header-logo

Practice—Pre-trial or post-judgment relief—Freezing order

17 August 2012
Issue: 7527 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Star Reefers Pool Inc v JFC Group Co Ltd [2012] EWHC 1803 (Comm), [2012] All ER (D) 50 (Aug)

Queen’s Bench Division, Commercial Court, Colin Edelman QC, 9 Mar 2012

The Commercial Court dealt with a number of aspects of enforcing a post-judgment worldwide freezing order.

Simon Rainey QC and Tom Macey-Dare (instructed by Stevenson Harwood) for the claimant. Steven Gee QC and Peter Stevenson (instructed by Swinnerton Moore LLP) for the defendant.

The claimant was granted a post-judgment worldwide freezing order against the defendant company upon an underlying claim which related to guarantees. The freezing order contained a prohibition on the defendant from dealing with or disposing by an “officer or agent appointed by power of attorney” with any of its assets other than in the ordinary or proper course of business. Further, before dealing with or disposing with assets exceeding £25,000 in value, the defendant was required to inform the claimant’s solicitors. As a result of the freezing order, the claimant applied for a number of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Sian Langer & Gemma Parker

Clyde & Co—Sian Langer & Gemma Parker

Firm strengthens catastrophic injury capability with partner promotions

DWF—Dean Gormley

DWF—Dean Gormley

Finance and restructuring team offering expands in Manchester with partner hire

Taylor Rose—Vicki Maflin

Taylor Rose—Vicki Maflin

Firm announces appointment of head of remortgage

NEWS
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
Delays at HM Land Registry are no longer a background irritation but a growing source of professional risk. Writing in NLJ this week, Phil Murrin of DAC Beachcroft explores how the ‘registration gap’—now stretching up to two years in complex cases—is fuelling client frustration, priority disputes, and negligence claims
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
back-to-top-scroll