header-logo header-logo

17 August 2012
Issue: 7527 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Practice—Pre-trial or post-judgment relief—Freezing order

Star Reefers Pool Inc v JFC Group Co Ltd [2012] EWHC 1803 (Comm), [2012] All ER (D) 50 (Aug)

Queen’s Bench Division, Commercial Court, Colin Edelman QC, 9 Mar 2012

The Commercial Court dealt with a number of aspects of enforcing a post-judgment worldwide freezing order.

Simon Rainey QC and Tom Macey-Dare (instructed by Stevenson Harwood) for the claimant. Steven Gee QC and Peter Stevenson (instructed by Swinnerton Moore LLP) for the defendant.

The claimant was granted a post-judgment worldwide freezing order against the defendant company upon an underlying claim which related to guarantees. The freezing order contained a prohibition on the defendant from dealing with or disposing by an “officer or agent appointed by power of attorney” with any of its assets other than in the ordinary or proper course of business. Further, before dealing with or disposing with assets exceeding £25,000 in value, the defendant was required to inform the claimant’s solicitors. As a result of the freezing order, the claimant applied for a number of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll