header-logo header-logo

17 August 2012
Issue: 7527 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Practice—Pre-trial or post-judgment relief—Freezing order

Star Reefers Pool Inc v JFC Group Co Ltd [2012] EWHC 1803 (Comm), [2012] All ER (D) 50 (Aug)

Queen’s Bench Division, Commercial Court, Colin Edelman QC, 9 Mar 2012

The Commercial Court dealt with a number of aspects of enforcing a post-judgment worldwide freezing order.

Simon Rainey QC and Tom Macey-Dare (instructed by Stevenson Harwood) for the claimant. Steven Gee QC and Peter Stevenson (instructed by Swinnerton Moore LLP) for the defendant.

The claimant was granted a post-judgment worldwide freezing order against the defendant company upon an underlying claim which related to guarantees. The freezing order contained a prohibition on the defendant from dealing with or disposing by an “officer or agent appointed by power of attorney” with any of its assets other than in the ordinary or proper course of business. Further, before dealing with or disposing with assets exceeding £25,000 in value, the defendant was required to inform the claimant’s solicitors. As a result of the freezing order, the claimant applied for a number of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll