header-logo header-logo

Predictive coding comes of age

13 May 2016 / Hitesh Chowdhry
Issue: 7698 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail
nlj_7698_chowdhry

Hitesh Chowdhry on deciphering the true meaning of Pyrrho for predictive coding

Master Matthews’s recent judgment in Pyrrho Investments Ltd and another v MWB Property Limited et al [HC-2014-000038], has been widely-cited as a ground-breaking decision for the use of predictive coding technology during disclosure. Predictive coding is a machine-learning algorithm which learns why documents are being categorised in a certain way on the basis of a sample set of documents which have been reviewed by a lawyer. The system’s learning can then be applied automatically to un-reviewed documents, thereby opening the possibility for potentially-relevant documents to be disregarded without having been reviewed by human eyes. The judgment has been heralded by many as the end of protracted and expensive document review exercises, signalling entry into a new world where litigators’ approach to disclosure is turned on its head.

The judgment: A starter for ten

Master Matthews helpfully set out a ten-point judgment which paves the way for future use of predictive coding technology. The pertinent takeaways can be summarised as follows:

There is no

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll