header-logo header-logo

Preventing fraud: better together?

21 February 2025 / Michael Goodwin KC , Theo Burges
Issue: 8105 / Categories: Features , Fraud , Criminal
printer mail-detail
208715
Michael Goodwin KC & Theo Burges explain how deferred prosecution agreements can be used in tandem with the new failure to prevent fraud offence
  • Key aspects of the new failure to prevent fraud (FTP) offence.
  • The core principles of the FTP government guidance.
  • Why the deferred prosecution agreements brand is likely to be expanded by and used in tandem with new FTP offence.

The long-awaited guidance on failure to prevent fraud (FPF) was published by the Home Office on 6 November 2024. The new law, which will come into effect on 1 September 2025, makes it an offence for an incorporated body to fail to prevent certain types of dishonesty and fraud-based conduct occurring while lacking adequate fraud prevention procedures being in place.

In and of itself, this represents another weapon in the arsenal of prosecuting authorities, particularly the Serious Fraud Office (SFO). But the spectre of the likely interaction between FPF and deferred prosecution agreements (DPAs) also looms for corporates. This article aims to

To access this full article please fill the form below.
All fields are mandatory unless marked as 'Optional'.
If you already a subscriber to New Law Journal, please login here

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Set welcomes two experienced juniors as new tenants

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll