header-logo header-logo

16 June 2011
Issue: 7470 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Privacy

DFT v TFD [2010] EWHC 2335 (QB), [2010] All ER (D) 103 (Oct)

In an application for interim relief before trial, which, if granted, might affect the exercise of the right to freedom of expression, s 12 of the Human Rights Act 1998 applied and no relief was to be granted so as to restrain publication before trial unless the court was satisfied that the applicant was likely to establish that publication should not be allowed. When considering whether the publication of information which was alleged to be private should be permitted, the court should first decide whether the information in question was private, that was whether the claimant had a reasonable expectation of privacy in respect of that information such that the claimant’s rights under Art 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights were engaged (stage 1). If yes, the court should then engage in a balancing exercise, weighing the Art 8 rights of the claimant against the Art 10 rights of the defendant (stage 2).

Relevant considerations included the attributes of the claimant, the nature of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Stephen Ward, The Barrister Group

NLJ Career Profile: Stephen Ward, The Barrister Group

From mowing lawns to life at the Bar: Stephen Ward reflects on an unconventional career

Clarke Willmott—Ben Loosemore

Clarke Willmott—Ben Loosemore

Commercial property partner joins Clarke Willmott in Southampton

Ellisons—Robert Tiffen

Ellisons—Robert Tiffen

Robert Tiffen joins Ellisons as Partner in growing Norwich office

NEWS
The Law Society RFC Festival of Sport returns next month, bringing together legal and financial services professionals for one of the sector’s largest annual sporting events
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

back-to-top-scroll