header-logo header-logo

16 June 2011
Issue: 7470 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Privacy

DFT v TFD [2010] EWHC 2335 (QB), [2010] All ER (D) 103 (Oct)

In an application for interim relief before trial, which, if granted, might affect the exercise of the right to freedom of expression, s 12 of the Human Rights Act 1998 applied and no relief was to be granted so as to restrain publication before trial unless the court was satisfied that the applicant was likely to establish that publication should not be allowed. When considering whether the publication of information which was alleged to be private should be permitted, the court should first decide whether the information in question was private, that was whether the claimant had a reasonable expectation of privacy in respect of that information such that the claimant’s rights under Art 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights were engaged (stage 1). If yes, the court should then engage in a balancing exercise, weighing the Art 8 rights of the claimant against the Art 10 rights of the defendant (stage 2).

Relevant considerations included the attributes of the claimant, the nature of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys senior leadership appointments

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths strengthens London Construction and Engineering practice with two strategic senior hires

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins announces strategic hire to deepen skills base in the social business sector

NEWS
Existing defamation law can respond to AI ‘hallucinations’, but allocating responsibility will prove harder where outputs reach users without human intervention
The High Court has upheld a rare successful serious-irregularity challenge after an arbitrator relied on an implied term neither party had advanced
Thirty years after The Future of Law shook a profession still using fax machines, its central forecast looks increasingly less like prophecy and more like description
Part-time status need only be an effective cause of less favourable treatment, rather than the sole cause, the Supreme Court has held in Augustine v Data Cars
Britain’s new acknowledgement that Israel’s occupation is unlawful, and accompanying settlement-goods ban and sanctions, is significant but overdue, argue Danny Friedman KC and Victor Kattan in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll