header-logo header-logo

Privacy

30 May 2014
Issue: 7608 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

R (on the application of Privacy International) v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2014] EWHC 1475 (Admin), [2014] All ER (D) 83 (May)

The issue in the case concerned the powers and duties of the defendant Revenue and Customs Commissioners to disclose information about its export control functions to the claimant non-governmental organisation, Privacy International. The court ruled (inter alia) that there was no discrete or freestanding function of the Revenue to provide information to third parties. However, it was not exempt from disclosure under s 18(2) of the Commissioners for Revenue and Customs Act 2005 if and insofar as it met the test therein. Further, the Revenue’s margin of appreciation could not be uniformly categorised. In some circumstances it might be materially or even very substantially circumscribed, in other cases it might be relatively broad. The outcome might differ depending upon the status of the person seeking information and the type and nature of information sought. It might also be temporally contingent, in that a wide-ranging request for detailed information at the outset of an investigation might be

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll