header-logo header-logo

30 May 2014
Issue: 7608 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Privacy

R (on the application of Privacy International) v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2014] EWHC 1475 (Admin), [2014] All ER (D) 83 (May)

The issue in the case concerned the powers and duties of the defendant Revenue and Customs Commissioners to disclose information about its export control functions to the claimant non-governmental organisation, Privacy International. The court ruled (inter alia) that there was no discrete or freestanding function of the Revenue to provide information to third parties. However, it was not exempt from disclosure under s 18(2) of the Commissioners for Revenue and Customs Act 2005 if and insofar as it met the test therein. Further, the Revenue’s margin of appreciation could not be uniformly categorised. In some circumstances it might be materially or even very substantially circumscribed, in other cases it might be relatively broad. The outcome might differ depending upon the status of the person seeking information and the type and nature of information sought. It might also be temporally contingent, in that a wide-ranging request for detailed information at the outset of an investigation might be

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll