header-logo header-logo

Privacy matters

28 February 2008 / Loraine Davenport
Issue: 7310 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

Most family cases are of no interest to anyone but the parties involved, says Loraine Davenport

There are stark anomalies in the family courts. In one of my cases my client was the mother in a contact application brought by a father whom she alleged had sexually abused their child. Findings were made against the father, which the father appealed. The case had been through five hearings in the county court. The mother was understandably protective of her child’s anonymity and was shocked to learn that the appeal hearing was open to the public. While reporting restrictions would, of course, prevent the parties being named, my client was concerned that there was potential for the general public to hear the details of her private trauma.

 

ANOMALIES

The press has a right to enter family proceedings courts but not the county courts. The higher courts are open so that when matters of law are appealed they are in open court.

The distinction is that the Family Proceedings Rules 1991

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

London firm announces acquisition of corporate team

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Head of corporate appointed following Teesside merger

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Firm expands into banking and finance sector with newly appointed head of banking

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll