header-logo header-logo

Private battles

30 September 2010 / Heather Duke
Issue: 7435 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Heather Duke asks how parents can be diverted from the battlefield

Sir Nicholas Wall’s speech to Families Need Fathers last month provoked a flurry of responses from journalists and others expressing their views about children being used as ammunition in the battlefield by parents whose relationship has broken down.

Sir Nicholas warned that the first and critical change to be made to the family justice system was to make it less adversarial. The Family Division president added that disputes over contact between absent parents and their former partners are rarely about the children concerned. Perhaps his most striking comment was that, in his experience, “as a rule of thumb, the more intelligent the parent, the more intractable the dispute”.

The debate has continued with some questioning whether it is money rather than intelligence that drives people forward into costly litigation. But whether it is intelligence, wealth or both, Sir Nicholas makes an important observation about private law children disputes. So when there is money and disharmony in abundance, how should practitioners react to minimise the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll