header-logo header-logo

30 September 2010 / Heather Duke
Issue: 7435 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Private battles

Heather Duke asks how parents can be diverted from the battlefield

Sir Nicholas Wall’s speech to Families Need Fathers last month provoked a flurry of responses from journalists and others expressing their views about children being used as ammunition in the battlefield by parents whose relationship has broken down.

Sir Nicholas warned that the first and critical change to be made to the family justice system was to make it less adversarial. The Family Division president added that disputes over contact between absent parents and their former partners are rarely about the children concerned. Perhaps his most striking comment was that, in his experience, “as a rule of thumb, the more intelligent the parent, the more intractable the dispute”.

The debate has continued with some questioning whether it is money rather than intelligence that drives people forward into costly litigation. But whether it is intelligence, wealth or both, Sir Nicholas makes an important observation about private law children disputes. So when there is money and disharmony in abundance, how should practitioners react to minimise the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys senior leadership appointments

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths strengthens London Construction and Engineering practice with two strategic senior hires

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins announces strategic hire to deepen skills base in the social business sector

NEWS
Existing defamation law can respond to AI ‘hallucinations’, but allocating responsibility will prove harder where outputs reach users without human intervention
The High Court has upheld a rare successful serious-irregularity challenge after an arbitrator relied on an implied term neither party had advanced
Thirty years after The Future of Law shook a profession still using fax machines, its central forecast looks increasingly less like prophecy and more like description
Part-time status need only be an effective cause of less favourable treatment, rather than the sole cause, the Supreme Court has held in Augustine v Data Cars
Britain’s new acknowledgement that Israel’s occupation is unlawful, and accompanying settlement-goods ban and sanctions, is significant but overdue, argue Danny Friedman KC and Victor Kattan in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll