The House of Lords has clarified the meaning of public functions. Nicholas Dobson explains
On 20 June 2007 the law lords in YL v Birmingham City Council and others [2007] UKHL 27, [2007] All ER (D) 207 (Jun) finally removed what has for some years been a grumbling legal appendix. This was whether a private care home was conducting public functions for the purposes of the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998), s 6 when providing care and accommodation for a publicly funded resident. The majority answer was no—Lord Bingham and Baroness Hale dissenting.
Lord Mance considered the intention of Parliament in enacting HRA 1998 and noted the observation of Lord Rodger in Aston Cantlow and Wilmcote with Billesley Parochial Church Council v Wallbank [2003] UKHL 37, [2003] 3 All ER 1213 that a purposive construction of s 6(1) indicates that “the essential characteristic of a public authority is that it carries out a function of government which would engage the responsibility of the United Kingdom before the Strasbourg organs”.
PUBLIC FUNDING
Lord Mance
-maryam-naaz-theo-corbett-and-rachel-carter-with-(front-from-left)-arya-vindlacheruvu-and-jessica-ashcroft.tmb-mov69x69.jpg?sfvrsn=47f89300_1)
