header-logo header-logo

21 October 2016 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7719 / Categories: Features , Public , Property
printer mail-detail

Private matters

nlj_7719_dobson

Nicholas Dobson considers proportionality surrounding eviction from private lettings

  • A court in possession proceedings brought by a private sector landlord is not required to consider the proportionality of evicting the occupier.

The role of proportionality in public sector housing possessions was effectively settled by the Supreme Court in November 2010. For in Manchester City Council v Pinnock [2010] UKSC 45, [2011] 1 All ER 285, Lord Neuberger, giving judgment for a nine judge court, had said (concerning Art 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)—right to respect for private and family life): “[I]f our law is to be compatible with Article 8, where a court is asked to make an order for possession of a person’s home at the suit of a local authority, the court must have the power to assess the proportionality of making the order, and, in making that assessment, to resolve any relevant dispute of fact.”

However, the Supreme Court did then point out that unencumbered property rights “are of real weight when it comes to proportionality”. So:

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll