header-logo header-logo

29 April 2010
Issue: 7415 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Proceeds of crime

R v Modjiri [2010] EWCA Crim 829, [2010] All ER (D) 146 (Apr)

While s 79(3) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 was concerned with the valuation of property, it was not concerned with its realisation. It did not require the court to assume that a beneficial interest had to be sold separately as such.

The court had to proceed on the basis that the defendant could obtain an order under the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 for the sale of the property as a whole, and that he would on sale receive his due proportion of the proceeds of sale. It followed that no discount suggested by the defendant in the instant case fell to be applied.

The possibility that the defendant would not obtain an order for sale of the property as a whole did not affect or diminish its market value, although the costs of obtaining the order might be relevant.

A property did not have a market value of nil because a beneficial owner might not readily

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll