header-logo header-logo

Proceeds of crime

29 April 2010
Issue: 7415 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

R v Modjiri [2010] EWCA Crim 829, [2010] All ER (D) 146 (Apr)

While s 79(3) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 was concerned with the valuation of property, it was not concerned with its realisation. It did not require the court to assume that a beneficial interest had to be sold separately as such.

The court had to proceed on the basis that the defendant could obtain an order under the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 for the sale of the property as a whole, and that he would on sale receive his due proportion of the proceeds of sale. It followed that no discount suggested by the defendant in the instant case fell to be applied.

The possibility that the defendant would not obtain an order for sale of the property as a whole did not affect or diminish its market value, although the costs of obtaining the order might be relevant.

A property did not have a market value of nil because a beneficial owner might not readily

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll