header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
17 March 2011 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7457 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Procurement matters

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Nicholas Dobson tackles Teckal

Back in June 2009 the Court of Appeal had declared unlawful the creation of a mutual insurance vehicle by Brent, Harrow and eight other London local authorities. The vehicle was London Authorities Mutual Limited (LAML). There were two essential limbs to the court’s decision. The first was that the authorities had no legal power to enter into such arrangements. And the second was that the authorities had breached the public procurement rules.

However, events have moved on. The previous government legislated to give authorities the powers they lacked in this context (see s 34 of the Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act 2009) with more local authority powers now on their way in the Localism Bill. And last month the Supreme Court ruled that the authorities had not in fact breached the public procurement rules (Brent London Borough Council and others v Risk Management Partners Ltd [2011] UKSC 7, [2011] All ER (D) 103 (Feb)).

Public Contracts Regulations 2006

Lord Hope (who gave the lead judgment) noted that the Public

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
LexisNexis Legal Awards 2026—the winners!
The winners of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2026 have now been announced, marking another outstanding celebration of excellence, innovation, and impact across the legal profession
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll