header-logo header-logo

17 March 2011 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7457 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Procurement matters

Nicholas Dobson tackles Teckal

Back in June 2009 the Court of Appeal had declared unlawful the creation of a mutual insurance vehicle by Brent, Harrow and eight other London local authorities. The vehicle was London Authorities Mutual Limited (LAML). There were two essential limbs to the court’s decision. The first was that the authorities had no legal power to enter into such arrangements. And the second was that the authorities had breached the public procurement rules.

However, events have moved on. The previous government legislated to give authorities the powers they lacked in this context (see s 34 of the Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act 2009) with more local authority powers now on their way in the Localism Bill. And last month the Supreme Court ruled that the authorities had not in fact breached the public procurement rules (Brent London Borough Council and others v Risk Management Partners Ltd [2011] UKSC 7, [2011] All ER (D) 103 (Feb)).

Public Contracts Regulations 2006

Lord Hope (who gave the lead judgment) noted that the Public

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll