header-logo header-logo

Procurement matters

17 March 2011 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7457 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Nicholas Dobson tackles Teckal

Back in June 2009 the Court of Appeal had declared unlawful the creation of a mutual insurance vehicle by Brent, Harrow and eight other London local authorities. The vehicle was London Authorities Mutual Limited (LAML). There were two essential limbs to the court’s decision. The first was that the authorities had no legal power to enter into such arrangements. And the second was that the authorities had breached the public procurement rules.

However, events have moved on. The previous government legislated to give authorities the powers they lacked in this context (see s 34 of the Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act 2009) with more local authority powers now on their way in the Localism Bill. And last month the Supreme Court ruled that the authorities had not in fact breached the public procurement rules (Brent London Borough Council and others v Risk Management Partners Ltd [2011] UKSC 7, [2011] All ER (D) 103 (Feb)).

Public Contracts Regulations 2006

Lord Hope (who gave the lead judgment) noted that the Public

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll