header-logo header-logo

05 March 2009 / Michael Walsh
Issue: 7359 / Categories: Features , Public , Property
printer mail-detail

Property: Ground offensive

Seeking possession under grounds 8, 10 & 11 for rent arrears. Michael Walsh explains

The three most common ways of seeking possession for rent arrears under an Assured shorthold tenancy (AST) are under the Housing Act 1988 (HA 1988), Sch 2, grounds 8, 10 and 11. Each of these grounds is explained in the box below. However, before a landlord may start a claim seeking possession he must first serve on the tenant a notice under the HA 1988, s 8. This section is clear that the court will not entertain proceedings for possession unless a s 8 notice has been served on the tenant (s 8(1)(a)) or the court has dispensed with service (s 8(1)(b)). Landlords should, however, note that it is not possible to dispense with service of a notice where ground 8 is relied upon. Landlords should always plead grounds 8, 10 and 11 in the alternative in a claim for possession for rent arrears. In deciding whether to dispense with the s 8 notice when relying

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll