header-logo header-logo

Property: Ground offensive

05 March 2009 / Michael Walsh
Issue: 7359 / Categories: Features , Public , Property
printer mail-detail

Seeking possession under grounds 8, 10 & 11 for rent arrears. Michael Walsh explains

The three most common ways of seeking possession for rent arrears under an Assured shorthold tenancy (AST) are under the Housing Act 1988 (HA 1988), Sch 2, grounds 8, 10 and 11. Each of these grounds is explained in the box below. However, before a landlord may start a claim seeking possession he must first serve on the tenant a notice under the HA 1988, s 8. This section is clear that the court will not entertain proceedings for possession unless a s 8 notice has been served on the tenant (s 8(1)(a)) or the court has dispensed with service (s 8(1)(b)). Landlords should, however, note that it is not possible to dispense with service of a notice where ground 8 is relied upon. Landlords should always plead grounds 8, 10 and 11 in the alternative in a claim for possession for rent arrears. In deciding whether to dispense with the s 8 notice when relying

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll