header-logo header-logo

17 July 2026 / Fern Schofield , Gwyneth Everson
Issue: 8170 / Categories: Features , Property , Landlord&tenant , Public
printer mail-detail

Property law brief: quarterly review (July 2026)

254940
© Getty images

From lease renewals to collective enfranchisement & public rights over land, Fern Schofield & Gwyneth Everson analyse the quarter’s most significant property law decisions

  • Reviews key UK property law decisions, highlighting developments in core doctrines, the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, leasehold compliance, and public rights over open land, with practical implications for property practitioners.

For this quarterly update, we consider a selection of recent important decisions in property law from March 2026 through to May 2026. This quarter has seen clarification of important doctrines in property law, significant developments in the application of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 and in leasehold compliance, as well as two interesting decisions on public rights over open land.

Doctrinal developments

Boult v Together Personal Finance Ltd [2026] EWHC 809 (Ch)

The High Court affirmed the rule in Pigot’s Case (1614) 11 Co.Rep. 26, which provides that a material alteration to a deed or other instrument after execution by one party without the knowledge or

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DAC Beachcroft—Clare Dewar

DAC Beachcroft—Clare Dewar

DAC Beachcroft strengthens Scottish real estate capabilitywith partner appointment

Womble Bond Dickinson—Brendan Ryan

Womble Bond Dickinson—Brendan Ryan

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints Brendan Ryan as partner in Public Law Projects team

Parklane Plowden Chambers—five appointments

Parklane Plowden Chambers—five appointments

Parklane Plowden Chambers welcomes five new barristers

NEWS
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
Police powers targeting concealed identities at protests come with procedural conditions that could determine whether prosecutions succeed
back-to-top-scroll