header-logo header-logo

Property minefield

07 October 2010
Issue: 7436 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Landlords urged to tread carefully as high-end rental market hit by tenancy confusion

New tenancy legislation could create “courtroom minefields”, the Residential Landlords Association (RLA) has warned.

The RLA’s warning comes after the  annual rent threshold for common “assured shorthold tenancies” was raised from £25,000 to £100,000 last week. The change is backdated to include all existing tenancies as well as new ones. This means thousands of higher-end properties in England must now comply with the tenancy deposit protection schemes.

The RLA says that landlords with unregistered deposits taken after 6 April 2007 for properties with an annual rent of up to £100,000 may be breaking the law. By law, deposits must be registered with a tenancy protection scheme within 14 days of receipt.

Alan Ward, RLA chairman, says that all of these issues could cause courtroom minefields.

“And any actions currently going through the courts to terminate a tenancy could be relying on the wrong notices because the tenancy agreements have now, in the meantime, officially become assured shorthold tenancies.”

The Department for Communities and Local Government

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll