header-logo header-logo

07 October 2010
Issue: 7436 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Property minefield

Landlords urged to tread carefully as high-end rental market hit by tenancy confusion

New tenancy legislation could create “courtroom minefields”, the Residential Landlords Association (RLA) has warned.

The RLA’s warning comes after the  annual rent threshold for common “assured shorthold tenancies” was raised from £25,000 to £100,000 last week. The change is backdated to include all existing tenancies as well as new ones. This means thousands of higher-end properties in England must now comply with the tenancy deposit protection schemes.

The RLA says that landlords with unregistered deposits taken after 6 April 2007 for properties with an annual rent of up to £100,000 may be breaking the law. By law, deposits must be registered with a tenancy protection scheme within 14 days of receipt.

Alan Ward, RLA chairman, says that all of these issues could cause courtroom minefields.

“And any actions currently going through the courts to terminate a tenancy could be relying on the wrong notices because the tenancy agreements have now, in the meantime, officially become assured shorthold tenancies.”

The Department for Communities and Local Government

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll