header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
08 November 2024 / Dr Ping-fat Sze
Issue: 8093 / Categories: Features , Profession , International
printer mail-detail

Prosecutorial decisions in Hong Kong: getting it wrong?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
196005
Dr Ping-fat Sze examines the reviewability of prosecutorial decisions & asks: are mistakes being made?
  • In Hong Kong, prosecutorial decisions are unreviewable even if plainly wrong in law or contrary to the evidence, and a decision in disregard of the prosecution policy is not impugnable.

In Director of Public Prosecutions v Ziegler and others [2021] UKSC 23, [2021] All ER (D) 70 (Jun), the UK Supreme Court decided that an operational proportionality exercise had to be conducted if restrictions were imposed on the freedom of assembly.

In a recent case where the appellants had been convicted of unauthorised assembly, the final appeal court of Hong Kong unanimously rejected this decision on the ground that a different scheme for human rights protection obtained in the UK (see HKSAR v Ng Ngoi Yee Margaret & Others (2024) 13 HKCFAR 208; ‘Shame of British judge keeping free speech hero in jail’, The Independent, 14 August 2024).

This is surprising. Notwithstanding marked divergences in the constitutional framework, the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: When post-breach events rewrite damages claims
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
NLJ this week: Supreme Court redraws unfair prejudice rules
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll