header-logo header-logo

Prosecutors are failing in statutory disclosure duties

15 May 2008
Issue: 7321 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

News

Crown prosecutors are complying properly with the statutory disclosure regime in only around half of cases, a report by HM Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate (HMCPSI) has found. Although the breaches did not mean potential miscarriages of justice, the report says, noncompliance resulted in adjournments and ineffective trials while disclosure issues were resolved, in 5.3% of the 152 magistrates’ court and crown court cases observed.

Delays to trials while advocates sorted out disclosure issues were common, impacting on court listing practices and other cases. Juries face significant waits, and the victims, witnesses and defendants are inconvenienced. In the cases scrutinised, the initial duty of disclosure was properly complied with in 56.6% of cases, continuing disclosure in 71.3% of relevant cases and sensitive material in 47.5%. Deficiencies include: description of material in schedules compiled by police disclosure officers; lack of examination of material by prosecutors; and lack of adequate recording of actions, decisions and the reasons for them by prosecutors. Blanket provision of unused material was sometimes made, passing the burden of examining material to the defence which caused delay.

The report says statutory duties for the handling of unused material— under the Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996, as amended by Criminal Justice Act 2003—were found to be onerous by police and prosecutors and the procedure can be convoluted. Stephen Wooler, HM Chief Inspector says: “More consistent and timely compliance with the statutory disclosure regime, with a crown prosecutor having considered the material itself when it is key or sensitive unused material, could reduce the overall resource demands of disclosure.” A CPS spokesperson says the CPS is addressing the issues raised in the report. She adds: “Although the report focuses on the role of the CPS, non-compliance by other players in the criminal justice system…also cause, contribute or add to problems.”

 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
back-to-top-scroll