header-logo header-logo

03 September 2013 / Neil Ward
Categories: Opinion , Human rights , Mental health
printer mail-detail

Protection matters

Non-therapeutic sterilisation makes history

“In my judgment it is overwhelmingly in DE’s best interests to have a vasectomy.” In making this conclusion Mrs Justice Eleanor King DBE brought to an end a lengthy, careful and above all compassionate judgment in which she made legal history by ordering that it was lawful for the Applicant NHS Trust to sterilise a male patient with a learning disability.

The patient, known as “DE”, is a 36-year-old man with an IQ of 40, equivalent to the mental age of a six- to nine-year-old child. He lives with his supportive parents whom the judge rightly praised for their commitment to “work tirelessly to give him the best possible quality of life”. He has a longstanding girlfriend who also has learning disabilities and in 2009 she became pregnant. Tests confirmed DE’s paternity which was a profound shock to the parents and shook the usually harmonious family environment. The parents took him to his GP to ask for a vasectomy to be performed. The GP in turn referred him to the Applicant Trust.

Neutrality

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll