header-logo header-logo

25 June 2009
Issue: 7375 / Categories: Legal News , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Protection for tenants

Landlord & tenant

Social housing tenants are more likely to be protected by the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998) following a landmark Court of Appeal judgment.
In R (on the application of Weaver) v London and Quadrant Housing Trust, the court held that some registered social landlords (RSLs) will now be treated as public authorities and therefore be subject to the HRA 1998.
John Wadham, group legal director of the Equality and Human Rights Commission, which intervened in the case, says: “Increasingly, the government is using private bodies to carry out public functions in areas such as social housing, care homes and detention and deportation services.

“It is only correct that RSLs, who are providing these public functions, be treated as a public authority and be subject to the Human Rights Act. This will require social landlords to consider the proportionality and reasonableness of their actions.”

The case concerned the attempted eviction of a tenant, Susan Weaver, from a flat where she had lived as an assured tenant since 1993, for allegedly failing to pay her rent for eight weeks.

The trust sought an order to repossess her property. The High Court found the Trust performed a public function and was therefore subject to HRA 1998. The Court of Appeal upheld the court’s view by a 2-1 majority.

Issue: 7375 / Categories: Legal News , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll