header-logo header-logo

Protective costs orders

21 October 2010 / Deirdre Lyons , Colleen Theron
Issue: 7438 / Categories: Features , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

PCOs are not a green light for environmental challenges. Deirdre Lyons & Colleen Theron explain why

Protective costs orders (PCOs) are intended to promote access to justice. They are often sought in judicial review applications containing a public interest element where claimants with limited resources are pursuing a claim that may benefit others.

R (Corner House) v SoS for Trade and Industry [2005] 4 All ER 1 stated that PCOs should only be made in exceptional circumstances, where: 

  • the issues raised are of public importance;
  • the public interest requires that those issues should be resolved;
  • the applicant has no private interest in the outcome of the case;
  • having regard to the financial resources of the applicant, the respondent(s) and to the amount of costs that are likely to be involved it is fair and just to make the order;
  • if the order is not made, the applicant will probably discontinue the proceedings and will be acting reasonably in doing so.

In R (Garner) v Elmbridge Borough Council [2010] EWCA

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll