header-logo header-logo

23 June 2017
Issue: 7751 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

Protocol pleading

Q Is there now a requirement for a claimant to state in their claim form or particulars of claim whether they have complied with any relevant protocol. I often observe this still being done but the requirement for it which was originally in the pre-action conduct PD seems to have disappeared from its current successor and I cannot find it anywhere. I have been criticised for omitting it from statements of case I have drafted.

A The requirement no longer exists although the directions questionnaires in fast and multi-track claims raise the subject. If it is thought that there is a likelihood that the defence will raise non-compliance with a view to seeking a stay or, ultimately, the imposition of a sanction on costs or interest then it could be useful to positively plead compliance in the particulars of claim.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll