header-logo header-logo

19 June 2026 / Dr Chris Pamplin
Issue: 8166 / Categories: Features , Profession , Expert Witness , Privacy , Disclosure
printer mail-detail

Public access to expert reports

252769
© Getty images

Dr Chris Pamplin considers the impact of an open justice pilot on expert witnesses & their work

  • Covers public access to expert witness reports, including a pilot scheme in the commercial courts that followed the Supreme Court decision in Dring.
  • Looks at a journalist’s request for access to expert reports by a clinical psychologist in a case, Jessica Bradley, after reporting on their work on parental alienation.

A two-year pilot scheme in the English commercial courts began on 1 January 2026. It gives the public automatic access to certain documents used in public civil hearings, including expert reports, reflecting the open justice principle and objectives of the Transparency & Open Justice Board. The scheme builds on the Supreme Court’s decision in Cape Intermediate Holdings Ltd v Dring [2019] UKSC 38, but remains controversial.

Wider public access to expert reports has many ramifications, with one of the main concerns being the often-unwanted publicity that publication of an expert report might bring to its author.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll