header-logo header-logo

19 June 2026 / Dr Chris Pamplin
Issue: 8166 / Categories: Features , Profession , Expert Witness , Privacy , Disclosure
printer mail-detail

Public access to expert reports

252769
© Getty images

Dr Chris Pamplin considers the impact of an open justice pilot on expert witnesses & their work

  • Covers public access to expert witness reports, including a pilot scheme in the commercial courts that followed the Supreme Court decision in Dring.
  • Looks at a journalist’s request for access to expert reports by a clinical psychologist in a case, Jessica Bradley, after reporting on their work on parental alienation.

A two-year pilot scheme in the English commercial courts began on 1 January 2026. It gives the public automatic access to certain documents used in public civil hearings, including expert reports, reflecting the open justice principle and objectives of the Transparency & Open Justice Board. The scheme builds on the Supreme Court’s decision in Cape Intermediate Holdings Ltd v Dring [2019] UKSC 38, but remains controversial.

Wider public access to expert reports has many ramifications, with one of the main concerns being the often-unwanted publicity that publication of an expert report might bring to its author.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys senior leadership appointments

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths strengthens London Construction and Engineering practice with two strategic senior hires

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins announces strategic hire to deepen skills base in the social business sector

NEWS
Existing defamation law can respond to AI ‘hallucinations’, but allocating responsibility will prove harder where outputs reach users without human intervention
The High Court has upheld a rare successful serious-irregularity challenge after an arbitrator relied on an implied term neither party had advanced
Thirty years after The Future of Law shook a profession still using fax machines, its central forecast looks increasingly less like prophecy and more like description
More than 100 teams from the legal and financial services sectors competed in five sports at the 51st Law Society RFC Festival of Sport earlier this month
Part-time status need only be an effective cause of less favourable treatment, rather than the sole cause, the Supreme Court has held in Augustine v Data Cars
back-to-top-scroll