header-logo header-logo

11 November 2011 / Dorothea Gartland
Issue: 7489 / Categories: Features , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

The public arena

Dorothea Gartland examines recent developments surrounding public law for children

Three recent Court of Appeal cases are of relevance to the lawyer practising in the area of public law for children. The first concerns legal professional privilege and the second and third cases involve the court’s jurisdiction to make injunctions.

Legal professional privilege

The case of Re D (A Child) [2011] EWCA Civ 684, [2011] 4 All ER 434 concerned a fact-finding hearing in care proceedings where a child had suffered several fractures. At the outset of proceedings, neither parent said they were culpable for the injuries and neither parent blamed the other for causing the injuries. The judge was facing the task of finding the material facts relating to the child’s injuries and trying to identify the perpetrator of those injuries.

A month before the fact-finding hearing the mother attended court and obtained an ex parte injunction against the father, alleging violence and threats by the father against her. The mother filed a statement at the same time, providing a different

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll