header-logo header-logo

The public arena

11 November 2011 / Dorothea Gartland
Issue: 7489 / Categories: Features , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

Dorothea Gartland examines recent developments surrounding public law for children

Three recent Court of Appeal cases are of relevance to the lawyer practising in the area of public law for children. The first concerns legal professional privilege and the second and third cases involve the court’s jurisdiction to make injunctions.

Legal professional privilege

The case of Re D (A Child) [2011] EWCA Civ 684, [2011] 4 All ER 434 concerned a fact-finding hearing in care proceedings where a child had suffered several fractures. At the outset of proceedings, neither parent said they were culpable for the injuries and neither parent blamed the other for causing the injuries. The judge was facing the task of finding the material facts relating to the child’s injuries and trying to identify the perpetrator of those injuries.

A month before the fact-finding hearing the mother attended court and obtained an ex parte injunction against the father, alleging violence and threats by the father against her. The mother filed a statement at the same time, providing a different

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll