header-logo header-logo

11 November 2011 / Dorothea Gartland
Issue: 7489 / Categories: Features , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

The public arena

Dorothea Gartland examines recent developments surrounding public law for children

Three recent Court of Appeal cases are of relevance to the lawyer practising in the area of public law for children. The first concerns legal professional privilege and the second and third cases involve the court’s jurisdiction to make injunctions.

Legal professional privilege

The case of Re D (A Child) [2011] EWCA Civ 684, [2011] 4 All ER 434 concerned a fact-finding hearing in care proceedings where a child had suffered several fractures. At the outset of proceedings, neither parent said they were culpable for the injuries and neither parent blamed the other for causing the injuries. The judge was facing the task of finding the material facts relating to the child’s injuries and trying to identify the perpetrator of those injuries.

A month before the fact-finding hearing the mother attended court and obtained an ex parte injunction against the father, alleging violence and threats by the father against her. The mother filed a statement at the same time, providing a different

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll