header-logo header-logo

12 March 2009 / Professor Susan Nash
Issue: 7360 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Public / Human rights: Human rights & wrongs

Susan Nash highlights some recent contentious cases considered by the European Court of Justice

Relying on Art 9 (right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion) the applicant in Mann Singh v France (App no 24479/07) complained that a regulation requiring him to appear bareheaded in a photograph on his driving licence amounted to an interference with the exercise of his right to freedom of religion.

No provision had been made in national law for separate treatment for members of the Sikh community, who are required to wear a turban at all times. The Conseil d'Etat took the view that the regulation, which was designed to reduce the risk of fraud or falsification of driving licences, was proportionate. The authorities responsible for public safety used identity photographs on driving licences to verify that the driver was authorised to drive the vehicle.

Although noting that the regulation amounted to an interference with a Convention right, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) was satisfied that it was

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll