header-logo header-logo

Public / Human rights: Human rights & wrongs

12 March 2009 / Professor Susan Nash
Issue: 7360 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Susan Nash highlights some recent contentious cases considered by the European Court of Justice

Relying on Art 9 (right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion) the applicant in Mann Singh v France (App no 24479/07) complained that a regulation requiring him to appear bareheaded in a photograph on his driving licence amounted to an interference with the exercise of his right to freedom of religion.

No provision had been made in national law for separate treatment for members of the Sikh community, who are required to wear a turban at all times. The Conseil d'Etat took the view that the regulation, which was designed to reduce the risk of fraud or falsification of driving licences, was proportionate. The authorities responsible for public safety used identity photographs on driving licences to verify that the driver was authorised to drive the vehicle.

Although noting that the regulation amounted to an interference with a Convention right, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) was satisfied that it was

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll