header-logo header-logo

Public / Human rights: Human rights & wrongs

12 March 2009 / Professor Susan Nash
Issue: 7360 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Susan Nash highlights some recent contentious cases considered by the European Court of Justice

Relying on Art 9 (right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion) the applicant in Mann Singh v France (App no 24479/07) complained that a regulation requiring him to appear bareheaded in a photograph on his driving licence amounted to an interference with the exercise of his right to freedom of religion.

No provision had been made in national law for separate treatment for members of the Sikh community, who are required to wear a turban at all times. The Conseil d'Etat took the view that the regulation, which was designed to reduce the risk of fraud or falsification of driving licences, was proportionate. The authorities responsible for public safety used identity photographs on driving licences to verify that the driver was authorised to drive the vehicle.

Although noting that the regulation amounted to an interference with a Convention right, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) was satisfied that it was

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll