header-logo header-logo

12 March 2009 / Professor Susan Nash
Issue: 7360 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Public / Human rights: Human rights & wrongs

Susan Nash highlights some recent contentious cases considered by the European Court of Justice

Relying on Art 9 (right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion) the applicant in Mann Singh v France (App no 24479/07) complained that a regulation requiring him to appear bareheaded in a photograph on his driving licence amounted to an interference with the exercise of his right to freedom of religion.

No provision had been made in national law for separate treatment for members of the Sikh community, who are required to wear a turban at all times. The Conseil d'Etat took the view that the regulation, which was designed to reduce the risk of fraud or falsification of driving licences, was proportionate. The authorities responsible for public safety used identity photographs on driving licences to verify that the driver was authorised to drive the vehicle.

Although noting that the regulation amounted to an interference with a Convention right, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) was satisfied that it was

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll