header-logo header-logo

21 July 2023 / Richard Scorer
Issue: 8034 / Categories: Opinion , Public , Inquests
printer mail-detail

Public inquiries: front-line evidence

131074
Public inquiries are most effective when their scrutiny goes below the surface, writes Richard Scorer

In recent years, a number of high-profile public inquiries have investigated serious failings by corporate bodies. To take four examples, the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA) sat between 2014 and 2022 and investigated responses to child sexual abuse by institutions in England and Wales. The Manchester Arena bombing inquiry sat between 2019 and 2023 and investigated multiple failures by various agencies, including police and security services. The Grenfell Tower inquiry, which has investigated multiple failings by corporate bodies, has been sitting since 2017. The COVID-19 inquiry, chaired by Baroness Hallett, commenced work last year and recently began hearings into the political response to the pandemic.

Public inquiries like these have the potential to achieve real change by improving responses to adverse events in the future, but only if the evidence of what went wrong is properly uncovered and scrutinised. Corporate bodies will inevitably seek to rebut criticism and justify actions taken. Evidence

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll