header-logo header-logo

21 July 2023 / Richard Scorer
Issue: 8034 / Categories: Opinion , Public , Inquests
printer mail-detail

Public inquiries: front-line evidence

131074
Public inquiries are most effective when their scrutiny goes below the surface, writes Richard Scorer

In recent years, a number of high-profile public inquiries have investigated serious failings by corporate bodies. To take four examples, the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA) sat between 2014 and 2022 and investigated responses to child sexual abuse by institutions in England and Wales. The Manchester Arena bombing inquiry sat between 2019 and 2023 and investigated multiple failures by various agencies, including police and security services. The Grenfell Tower inquiry, which has investigated multiple failings by corporate bodies, has been sitting since 2017. The COVID-19 inquiry, chaired by Baroness Hallett, commenced work last year and recently began hearings into the political response to the pandemic.

Public inquiries like these have the potential to achieve real change by improving responses to adverse events in the future, but only if the evidence of what went wrong is properly uncovered and scrutinised. Corporate bodies will inevitably seek to rebut criticism and justify actions taken. Evidence

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ward Hadaway—19 promotions

Ward Hadaway—19 promotions

19 promotions across national offices, including two new partners

Brabners—Ruth Hargreaves

Brabners—Ruth Hargreaves

Partner promoted to head of corporate team

Slater Heelis—Liam Hall, Jordan Bear & Joe Madigan

Slater Heelis—Liam Hall, Jordan Bear & Joe Madigan

Chester office expansion accelerates with triple appointment

NEWS
As AI chatbots increasingly provide legal and commercial advice, English law is beginning to confront who should bear responsibility when automated systems get things wrong
Businesses are facing a ‘dramatic rise in prosecution risks’ as sweeping reforms to corporate criminal liability come into force, expanding the net of who can be held responsible for wrongdoing inside organisations
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has reignited debate over what exactly counts as the ‘conduct of litigation’ in modern legal practice
A controversial High Court financial remedies ruling has reignited debate over secrecy, non-disclosure and fairness in divorce proceedings involving hidden wealth
Britain’s deferred prosecution agreement regime is undergoing a significant shift, with prosecutors placing renewed emphasis on corporate cooperation, reform and early self-reporting
back-to-top-scroll