header-logo header-logo

Public knowledge

10 January 2014 / Simon Goldie
Issue: 7589 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail
web_goldie

The Big Four accountancy firms engage with government, why not law firms, asks Simon Goldie

Part of the Big Four accountancy firms’ business objectives is to engage with government. Each partnership has a public affairs function. Much to the chagrin of Public Accounts Committee chair Margaret Hodge, they provide staff on secondment to work at HM Revenue & Custom and HM Treasury. At least one firm offers free help to HM Opposition too. They also have tax policy directors whose brief includes commenting on tax legislation. This ongoing engagement serves several purposes: it provides the Big Four with an understanding of government policy, it gives them the opportunity to improve legislation and it can be said to be for the common good.

A different approach

Law firms tend to take a different approach. They may engage with politicians via a public affairs agency or rely on their representative body, the Law Society, to speak out for the profession. Generally they shy away from running a public engagement programme.

After all the changes that the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll