header-logo header-logo

10 January 2014 / Simon Goldie
Issue: 7589 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Public knowledge

web_goldie

The Big Four accountancy firms engage with government, why not law firms, asks Simon Goldie

Part of the Big Four accountancy firms’ business objectives is to engage with government. Each partnership has a public affairs function. Much to the chagrin of Public Accounts Committee chair Margaret Hodge, they provide staff on secondment to work at HM Revenue & Custom and HM Treasury. At least one firm offers free help to HM Opposition too. They also have tax policy directors whose brief includes commenting on tax legislation. This ongoing engagement serves several purposes: it provides the Big Four with an understanding of government policy, it gives them the opportunity to improve legislation and it can be said to be for the common good.

A different approach

Law firms tend to take a different approach. They may engage with politicians via a public affairs agency or rely on their representative body, the Law Society, to speak out for the profession. Generally they shy away from running a public engagement programme.

After all the changes that the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll