header-logo header-logo

10 January 2014 / Simon Goldie
Issue: 7589 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Public knowledge

web_goldie

The Big Four accountancy firms engage with government, why not law firms, asks Simon Goldie

Part of the Big Four accountancy firms’ business objectives is to engage with government. Each partnership has a public affairs function. Much to the chagrin of Public Accounts Committee chair Margaret Hodge, they provide staff on secondment to work at HM Revenue & Custom and HM Treasury. At least one firm offers free help to HM Opposition too. They also have tax policy directors whose brief includes commenting on tax legislation. This ongoing engagement serves several purposes: it provides the Big Four with an understanding of government policy, it gives them the opportunity to improve legislation and it can be said to be for the common good.

A different approach

Law firms tend to take a different approach. They may engage with politicians via a public affairs agency or rely on their representative body, the Law Society, to speak out for the profession. Generally they shy away from running a public engagement programme.

After all the changes that the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll