header-logo header-logo

Public Law Update

10 January 2008
Issue: 7303 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Compatibility

Secretary of State for the Home Department v MB; Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF [2007] UKHL 46, [2007] All ER (D) 01 (Nov)

 

This case primarily concerned two questions arising from issues of the compatibility of control order hearing procedures with Art 6 (right to a fair trial) of the Convention.

 

Both MB and AF were the subjects of non-derogating control orders.

 

Case facts

 

MB was a 24-year-old British citizen, born in . It was alleged by the secretary of state for the Home Department that MB had intended to travel to to fight against coalition forces, which MB denied. MB had sought to challenge his non-derogating control order. On 12 April 2006, Sullivan J maintained the order but declared PTA 2005, s 3 to be incompatible with Art 6(1) under s 4(2) of the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998): [2006] EWHC 1000 (Admin). The Court of Appeal set aside the declaration of incompatibility on 1 August 2006: [2006] EWCA Civ 1140. MB appealed to the House.

 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Lawyers can no longer afford to ignore the metaverse, says Jacqueline Watts of Allin1 Advisory in this week's NLJ. Far from being a passing tech fad, virtual platforms like Roblox host thriving economies and social interactions, raising real legal issues
back-to-top-scroll