header-logo header-logo

10 January 2008
Issue: 7303 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Public Law Update

Compatibility

Secretary of State for the Home Department v MB; Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF [2007] UKHL 46, [2007] All ER (D) 01 (Nov)

 

This case primarily concerned two questions arising from issues of the compatibility of control order hearing procedures with Art 6 (right to a fair trial) of the Convention.

 

Both MB and AF were the subjects of non-derogating control orders.

 

Case facts

 

MB was a 24-year-old British citizen, born in . It was alleged by the secretary of state for the Home Department that MB had intended to travel to to fight against coalition forces, which MB denied. MB had sought to challenge his non-derogating control order. On 12 April 2006, Sullivan J maintained the order but declared PTA 2005, s 3 to be incompatible with Art 6(1) under s 4(2) of the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998): [2006] EWHC 1000 (Admin). The Court of Appeal set aside the declaration of incompatibility

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NLJ Career Profile: Mark Hastings, Quillon Law

NLJ Career Profile: Mark Hastings, Quillon Law

Mark Hastings, founding partner of Quillon Law, on turning dreams into reality and pushing back on preconceptions about partnership

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll