header-logo header-logo

10 January 2008
Issue: 7303 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Public Law Update

Compatibility

Secretary of State for the Home Department v MB; Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF [2007] UKHL 46, [2007] All ER (D) 01 (Nov)

 

This case primarily concerned two questions arising from issues of the compatibility of control order hearing procedures with Art 6 (right to a fair trial) of the Convention.

 

Both MB and AF were the subjects of non-derogating control orders.

 

Case facts

 

MB was a 24-year-old British citizen, born in . It was alleged by the secretary of state for the Home Department that MB had intended to travel to to fight against coalition forces, which MB denied. MB had sought to challenge his non-derogating control order. On 12 April 2006, Sullivan J maintained the order but declared PTA 2005, s 3 to be incompatible with Art 6(1) under s 4(2) of the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998): [2006] EWHC 1000 (Admin). The Court of Appeal set aside the declaration of incompatibility

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
Artificial intelligence does not demand a wholesale rewrite of liability law, argues an article challenging claims that new technology has created an accountability gap
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
back-to-top-scroll