header-logo header-logo

15 February 2007 / Henrietta Hill , Stephen Cragg
Issue: 7260 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Public Law Update

THE LAWFULNESS OF WAR >>
POLICE SHOOTINGS >>
RESTRICTIVE APPROACH TO DISCLOSURE >>
PROTECTIVE COSTS ORDER >>

LEGAL BASIS FOR WAR

In R (on the application of Gentle and Clarke) v The Prime Minister and others [2006] EWCA Civ 1690 the Court of Appeal considered the government’s refusal to hold an independent inquiry into the legal basis for the war in Iraq.

The applicants were the mothers of British soldiers killed during the Iraq war. They sought a public inquiry to consider the question of whether the invasion of Iraq had been illegal, arguing that the implied obligation in Art 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention) (right to life) required such an inquiry.

On 26 July 2006 the Court of Appeal had granted permission on the basis that the importance of the issues was a compelling reason why the appeal should be heard (see 156 NLJ 7239, p 1360).

Non-justiciability

Apart from the possible effect of the Human Rights Act 1998, the question of whether the invasion

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll