header-logo header-logo

Public Law Update

15 February 2007 / Henrietta Hill , Stephen Cragg
Issue: 7260 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

THE LAWFULNESS OF WAR >>
POLICE SHOOTINGS >>
RESTRICTIVE APPROACH TO DISCLOSURE >>
PROTECTIVE COSTS ORDER >>

LEGAL BASIS FOR WAR

In R (on the application of Gentle and Clarke) v The Prime Minister and others [2006] EWCA Civ 1690 the Court of Appeal considered the government’s refusal to hold an independent inquiry into the legal basis for the war in Iraq.

The applicants were the mothers of British soldiers killed during the Iraq war. They sought a public inquiry to consider the question of whether the invasion of Iraq had been illegal, arguing that the implied obligation in Art 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention) (right to life) required such an inquiry.

On 26 July 2006 the Court of Appeal had granted permission on the basis that the importance of the issues was a compelling reason why the appeal should be heard (see 156 NLJ 7239, p 1360).

Non-justiciability

Apart from the possible effect of the Human Rights Act 1998, the question of whether the invasion of Iraq had been

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll