header-logo header-logo

15 February 2007 / Henrietta Hill , Stephen Cragg
Issue: 7260 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Public Law Update

THE LAWFULNESS OF WAR >>
POLICE SHOOTINGS >>
RESTRICTIVE APPROACH TO DISCLOSURE >>
PROTECTIVE COSTS ORDER >>

LEGAL BASIS FOR WAR

In R (on the application of Gentle and Clarke) v The Prime Minister and others [2006] EWCA Civ 1690 the Court of Appeal considered the government’s refusal to hold an independent inquiry into the legal basis for the war in Iraq.

The applicants were the mothers of British soldiers killed during the Iraq war. They sought a public inquiry to consider the question of whether the invasion of Iraq had been illegal, arguing that the implied obligation in Art 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention) (right to life) required such an inquiry.

On 26 July 2006 the Court of Appeal had granted permission on the basis that the importance of the issues was a compelling reason why the appeal should be heard (see 156 NLJ 7239, p 1360).

Non-justiciability

Apart from the possible effect of the Human Rights Act 1998, the question of whether the invasion

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll