header-logo header-logo

PUBLIC REPRIMANDS

08 February 2007
Issue: 7259 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

In brief

Reprimands against solicitors may be made public to help consumers make choices about legal services and to deter bad practice. The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) is asking for comments on proposals to publish: findings of misconduct that result in a reprimand; conditions put on practising certificates; details of allegations in cases accepted by the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal; agreements to conclude a regulatory investigation; and decisions to intervene in legal practices. Currently, only Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal decisions are made public. The questionnaire, Modernisation of Regulatory Decisions, is at www.consultations.sra.org.uk and will close on 4 May 2007.

Issue: 7259 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
back-to-top-scroll