header-logo header-logo

08 February 2007
Issue: 7259 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

PUBLIC REPRIMANDS

In brief

Reprimands against solicitors may be made public to help consumers make choices about legal services and to deter bad practice. The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) is asking for comments on proposals to publish: findings of misconduct that result in a reprimand; conditions put on practising certificates; details of allegations in cases accepted by the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal; agreements to conclude a regulatory investigation; and decisions to intervene in legal practices. Currently, only Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal decisions are made public. The questionnaire, Modernisation of Regulatory Decisions, is at www.consultations.sra.org.uk and will close on 4 May 2007.

Issue: 7259 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys senior leadership appointments

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths strengthens London Construction and Engineering practice with two strategic senior hires

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins announces strategic hire to deepen skills base in the social business sector

NEWS
Existing defamation law can respond to AI ‘hallucinations’, but allocating responsibility will prove harder where outputs reach users without human intervention
The High Court has upheld a rare successful serious-irregularity challenge after an arbitrator relied on an implied term neither party had advanced
Thirty years after The Future of Law shook a profession still using fax machines, its central forecast looks increasingly less like prophecy and more like description
More than 100 teams from the legal and financial services sectors competed in five sports at the 51st Law Society RFC Festival of Sport earlier this month
Part-time status need only be an effective cause of less favourable treatment, rather than the sole cause, the Supreme Court has held in Augustine v Data Cars
back-to-top-scroll