header-logo header-logo

22 October 2009 / Robert Latham
Issue: 7390 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

Public rights & wrongs

Robert Latham reports on disclosure, cross-examination & equality

R(Al-Sweady and Others) v Secretary of State for Defence [2009] EWHC 2387 Admin (2 October 2009) raised hotly contested issues of fact as to whether members of the British army killed or tortured Iraqis, whom they had taken prisoner on 14 May 2004.

The claimants contended that the rights of the prisoners under Arts 2, 3 and 5 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (the Convention) had been infringed. The extent of the factual disputes and the failure of the secretary of state to give proper disclosure meant that the hearing of the judicial review application lasted for 20 days in April and May 2009 and 10 live witnesses were heard.

The secretary of state finally accepted that he could not give the reassurance that all material documents had been disclosed. The claimants then obtained the relief they sought, namely a fresh investigation into the allegations of murder and torture sufficient to comply with Arts 2 and 3

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll