header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
05 March 2009 / Seamus Burns
Issue: 7359 / Categories: Features , Public , Community care , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Public: An unlawful procession?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Kay is a welcome boost for small but priceless freedoms. Seamus Burns explains why

It is extremely heartening to see the law lords recognising the perils of acceding to the wishes of the police in insisting on cyclists giving advance notice of an impromptu, yet long established, cycle ride (see Kay v Commissioner of the Police of the Metropolis [2008] UKHL 69, [2008] All ER (D) 255 (Nov)).

This may appear an innocuous requirement by the police, but, is nonetheless, a worrying example of the executive (here the police) chipping away at our residual freedoms. The law lords' decision arguably recognises that authoritarian societies can emerge incrementally: the price of our freedoms rest on the constant vigilance partially of our judges.

Legal issues

Lord Phillips set out the “agreed facts” in the case, namely: “Critical Mass is not an organisation but the name given to a recurrent event…It takes place in central London on the evening of the last Friday of every month, as it has done

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll