header-logo header-logo

05 March 2009 / Seamus Burns
Issue: 7359 / Categories: Features , Public , Community care , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Public: An unlawful procession?

Kay is a welcome boost for small but priceless freedoms. Seamus Burns explains why

It is extremely heartening to see the law lords recognising the perils of acceding to the wishes of the police in insisting on cyclists giving advance notice of an impromptu, yet long established, cycle ride (see Kay v Commissioner of the Police of the Metropolis [2008] UKHL 69, [2008] All ER (D) 255 (Nov)).

This may appear an innocuous requirement by the police, but, is nonetheless, a worrying example of the executive (here the police) chipping away at our residual freedoms. The law lords' decision arguably recognises that authoritarian societies can emerge incrementally: the price of our freedoms rest on the constant vigilance partially of our judges.

Legal issues

Lord Phillips set out the “agreed facts” in the case, namely: “Critical Mass is not an organisation but the name given to a recurrent event…It takes place in central London on the evening of the last Friday of every month, as it has done

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll