header-logo header-logo

05 March 2009 / Seamus Burns
Issue: 7359 / Categories: Features , Public , Community care , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Public: An unlawful procession?

Kay is a welcome boost for small but priceless freedoms. Seamus Burns explains why

It is extremely heartening to see the law lords recognising the perils of acceding to the wishes of the police in insisting on cyclists giving advance notice of an impromptu, yet long established, cycle ride (see Kay v Commissioner of the Police of the Metropolis [2008] UKHL 69, [2008] All ER (D) 255 (Nov)).

This may appear an innocuous requirement by the police, but, is nonetheless, a worrying example of the executive (here the police) chipping away at our residual freedoms. The law lords' decision arguably recognises that authoritarian societies can emerge incrementally: the price of our freedoms rest on the constant vigilance partially of our judges.

Legal issues

Lord Phillips set out the “agreed facts” in the case, namely: “Critical Mass is not an organisation but the name given to a recurrent event…It takes place in central London on the evening of the last Friday of every month, as it has done

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll