header-logo header-logo

Pushing boundaries?

24 April 2015 / Warren Collins
Issue: 7649 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail
nlj_24_04_15_collins

Warren Collins explores the legal implications of medical deterioration in brain injury cases

Clinicians working in the field of brain injuries as well as the self-styled “neuro lawyers” have traditionally pigeon-holed brain injuries into a range from minor to very severe. This categorisation can in itself lead to difficulties in that these injuries do not always follow the predicted path. By their very nature, brain injuries throw up some interesting outcomes: some patients achieve far more than expected and others do disappointingly worse. The added complication is that neither improvement nor deterioration tracks a straight line path. I have often found myself advising clients and reminding opponents and the court that the only consistency in brain injury is inconsistency. This can all be rather inconvenient to the experts, lawyers and judges involved in brain injury claims where the parties must do their best to predict the medical future for the brain injured accident victim.

This problem has been ameliorated to some extent by the introduction of periodical payments (which the court has the power to vary

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—19 appointments

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
Artificial intelligence may be revolutionising the law, but its misuse could wreck cases and careers, warns Clare Arthurs of Penningtons Manches Cooper in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll