header-logo header-logo

22 January 2016 / James Robottom
Issue: 7683 / Categories: Features , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Put it on the Bill

nlj_7683_robottom

James Robottom examines the UK Bill of Rights process

The words of the Conservative Party 2015 Manifesto were clear enough: the next Conservative government will scrap the Human Rights Act, and introduce a British Bill of Rights.

By the time of the Queen’s speech on 27 May, however, it was clear that any “scrapping” was to be delayed. The speech contained only the rather watered down promise from Her Majesty that the government would “bring forward proposals for a British Bill of Rights”.

In the House of Commons on 8 September Dominic Raab, parliamentary under-secretary for justice, stated proposals for a Bill of Rights would be brought forward in the autumn, but refused “to be drawn on the substance and detail”.

Nothing more was then heard for some time. On 4 November Harriett Harman, appointed chair of the Joint Committee on Human Rights, wrote to Minister of Justice Michael Gove with five questions that highlighted the complete lack of information available on the proposals. They included whether the UK is to withdraw from

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll