header-logo header-logo

22 January 2016 / James Robottom
Issue: 7683 / Categories: Features , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Put it on the Bill

nlj_7683_robottom

James Robottom examines the UK Bill of Rights process

The words of the Conservative Party 2015 Manifesto were clear enough: the next Conservative government will scrap the Human Rights Act, and introduce a British Bill of Rights.

By the time of the Queen’s speech on 27 May, however, it was clear that any “scrapping” was to be delayed. The speech contained only the rather watered down promise from Her Majesty that the government would “bring forward proposals for a British Bill of Rights”.

In the House of Commons on 8 September Dominic Raab, parliamentary under-secretary for justice, stated proposals for a Bill of Rights would be brought forward in the autumn, but refused “to be drawn on the substance and detail”.

Nothing more was then heard for some time. On 4 November Harriett Harman, appointed chair of the Joint Committee on Human Rights, wrote to Minister of Justice Michael Gove with five questions that highlighted the complete lack of information available on the proposals. They included whether the UK is to withdraw from

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys senior leadership appointments

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths strengthens London Construction and Engineering practice with two strategic senior hires

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins announces strategic hire to deepen skills base in the social business sector

NEWS
More than 100 teams from the legal and financial services sectors competed in five sports at the 51st Law Society RFC Festival of Sport earlier this month
Part-time status need only be an effective cause of less favourable treatment, rather than the sole cause, the Supreme Court has held in Augustine v Data Cars
Britain’s new acknowledgement that Israel’s occupation is unlawful, and accompanying settlement-goods ban and sanctions, is significant but overdue, argue Danny Friedman KC and Victor Kattan in NLJ this week
New planning fee rises, wider trade union access rights and a service-by-email trap feature in Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way
Existing defamation law can respond to AI ‘hallucinations’, but allocating responsibility will prove harder where outputs reach users without human intervention
back-to-top-scroll