header-logo header-logo

Putting wrongs to rights (Pt 1)

27 May 2016 / Nicholas Bevan
Issue: 7700 / Categories: Features , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail
nlj_7700_bevan

In the first of two articles, Nicholas Bevan explains why he believes the MIB is liable for defects in the Road Traffic Act

Motor accident victims are entitled to claim compensation directly from the Motor Insurers’ Bureau (MIB) for incidents that ought to be covered by the compulsory third party insurance provisions of Pt VI of the Road Traffic Act 1988 (RTA 1988) but where, due to the secretary of state for transport’s inaction, they are not.

Longstanding non-conformity

Between them, ss 143 and 145 RTA 1988 prescribe the nature and extent of the compulsory third party motor vehicle insurance requirement. This confines its geographic scope to use in public places (see s 185) and it is further restricted to motor vehicles intended or adapted for road use (see s 192). However, these constraints are clearly incompatible with the broader scope of the European Directive (2009/103/EC) on motor insurance (the Directive).

Articles 3 and 10 of the Directive set out the scope of the third party motor insurance requirement as well as the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll