header-logo header-logo

11 September 2008 / Ed Mitchell , Clive Lewis
Issue: 7336 / Categories: Features , Public , Community care
printer mail-detail

Qualifying human rights

Ed Mitchell and Clive Lewis QC examine the precarious relationship between social care and HRA 1998

Towards the end of its passage through Parliament, the Health and Social Care Bill was amended so as to reverse the decision of the law lords in YL v Birmingham CC [2007] UKHL 27, [2007] 3 All ER 957. In YL it was held, by a majority of 3–2, that independent care homes that accommodate persons on behalf of local authorities are not, in so doing, caught by the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998).

The Bill has now been enacted as the Health and Social Care Act 2008. Section 145 contains the relevant provisions, the fulcrum of which is sub-s 1 which reads as follows: “A person (P) who provides accommodation, together with nursing or personal care, in a care home for an individual under arrangements made with P under the relevant statutory provisions (eg s 21 of the National Assistance Act 1948) is to be taken for the purposes of sub-s (3)(b) of section

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll