header-logo header-logo

11 September 2008 / Ed Mitchell , Clive Lewis
Issue: 7336 / Categories: Features , Public , Community care
printer mail-detail

Qualifying human rights

Ed Mitchell and Clive Lewis QC examine the precarious relationship between social care and HRA 1998

Towards the end of its passage through Parliament, the Health and Social Care Bill was amended so as to reverse the decision of the law lords in YL v Birmingham CC [2007] UKHL 27, [2007] 3 All ER 957. In YL it was held, by a majority of 3–2, that independent care homes that accommodate persons on behalf of local authorities are not, in so doing, caught by the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998).

The Bill has now been enacted as the Health and Social Care Act 2008. Section 145 contains the relevant provisions, the fulcrum of which is sub-s 1 which reads as follows: “A person (P) who provides accommodation, together with nursing or personal care, in a care home for an individual under arrangements made with P under the relevant statutory provisions (eg s 21 of the National Assistance Act 1948) is to be taken for the purposes of sub-s (3)(b) of section

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll