header-logo header-logo

19 July 2007 / Philip Mott
Issue: 7282 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Quality assured

Core advocacy skills must be at the heart of any quality assurance scheme, says Philip Mott QC

Like it or not, the Bar is changing. The Legal Services Bill, slowly making its way through Parliament, will bring changes of structure to the provision of legal services—or at least remove the present restrictions on the kind of structures through which legal services can be provided. Statutory emphasis will be put on the consumer’s needs, and one of these is an assurance of the quality of legal services in an open market.

This all sounds laudable, but is there any need for further bureaucracy? It would be wrong to think of quality assurance as a new concept for the Bar. Barristers have been selling their services to a sophisticated and knowledgeable market for centuries. Solicitors who choose counsel, having watched them in court, are accountable to their clients. And the corporate, institutional or insurance client, the provider of repeat business, is also sophisticated and demanding. Such a private market model provides its own assurance of quality—high quality leads

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll