header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
19 July 2007 / Philip Mott
Issue: 7282 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Quality assured

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Core advocacy skills must be at the heart of any quality assurance scheme, says Philip Mott QC

Like it or not, the Bar is changing. The Legal Services Bill, slowly making its way through Parliament, will bring changes of structure to the provision of legal services—or at least remove the present restrictions on the kind of structures through which legal services can be provided. Statutory emphasis will be put on the consumer’s needs, and one of these is an assurance of the quality of legal services in an open market.

This all sounds laudable, but is there any need for further bureaucracy? It would be wrong to think of quality assurance as a new concept for the Bar. Barristers have been selling their services to a sophisticated and knowledgeable market for centuries. Solicitors who choose counsel, having watched them in court, are accountable to their clients. And the corporate, institutional or insurance client, the provider of repeat business, is also sophisticated and demanding. Such a private market model provides its own assurance of quality—high quality leads

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll