header-logo header-logo

Queen approves next Supreme team

25 July 2019
Issue: 7850 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail
The Queen has appointed Scottish judge Lord Reed as the next President of the UK’s Supreme Court, succeeding Baroness Hale.

He will take up his new role on 11 January 2020, the day after Lady Hale retires. She has served as President since September 2017.

Three Justices have also been appointed this week― Lord Justice Hamblen, Lord Justice Leggatt and Professor Andrew Burrows will join the court on 13 January, 21 April and 2 June 2020, respectively.

Lord Reed attended George Watson’s College in Edinburgh, and the Universities of Edinburgh and Oxford, later practising as an advocate in Scotland in a wide range of civil cases as well as prosecuting crime. He also qualified as a barrister in England and Wales.  

In his judicial career, he sat from 1998 to 2008 in the Outer House of the Court of Session, where he was the Principal Commercial and Companies Judge, and from 2008 to 2012 in the Inner House. He joined the Supreme Court in February 2012 and has been Deputy President since June 2018. He is also a member of the panel of ad hoc judges of the European Court of Human Rights, a Non-Permanent Judge of the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal, and the High Steward of Oxford University.

Lord Reed said: ‘As President I will continue to champion the rule of law, alongside promoting public understanding of the role of the judiciary and maintaining the high regard in which the Court is held around the world.’

Lord Hamblen practised at the Commercial Bar from 1982 to 2008, when he became a High Court judge.  He was appointed a Lord Justice of Appeal in 2016.

Lord Leggatt worked as a foreign lawyer at the law firm of Sullivan & Cromwell in New York, before joining Brick Court Chambers in London in 1985, specialising in commercial cases. He was appointed a High Court Judge in 2012, and promoted to the Court of Appeal in 2018.

Professor Andrew Burrows is Professor of the Law of England at Oxford University, and has been a barrister at Fountain Court Chambers since 1989. He has been sitting as a part-time judge for more than 20 years, and is a former Law Commissioner for England and Wales (1994-1999) and President of the Society of Legal Scholars (2015-16). He has written books and articles on contract, tort, unjust enrichment, and statute law. 

Issue: 7850 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll