header-logo header-logo

08 July 2026
Issue: 8169 / Categories: Legal News , Media , Costs , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

Questions remain over bill following Associated Newspapers ruling

The Duke of Sussex and his co-claimants face a ‘potentially eye-watering legal bill’ of more than £50m, according to former costs judge at the Royal Courts of Justice, Colin Campbell

Mr Justice Nicklin dismissed their claims against Associated Newspapers this week. However, Campbell, consultant at Kain Knight, said: ‘The litigation is not yet over.’

Campbell said Associated Newspapers may seek to recover costs on an indemnity basis—reserved for cases where the court considers a party’s conduct has fallen outside the norm. If granted, it could recover ‘a substantially greater proportion of its legal costs because it would not have to satisfy the court that those costs were proportionate and necessary, only that they were reasonably incurred,’ he said.

‘In litigation of this scale, the difference could amount to a significant amount of money.

‘One important unanswered question is whether the claimants have after-the-event insurance in place, which is commonly used in high-value litigation to cover some or all of the legal costs a claimant may be ordered to pay if they lose. That is not currently known publicly, but it could become a significant issue as the proceedings move into the costs phase.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll