19 March 2009 / Emma Sadler

Issue: 7361 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice

printer

mail-detail

A quick fix or a long battle?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Part 2: Early neutral evaluation or arbitration? Emma Sadler considers the alternatives to litigation

Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) has increased in popularity steadily over the last decade. In part one of this article the merits of mediation and expert determination were discussed (see NLJ, 30 January 2009, p 154). Part two considers the benefits of avoiding litigation by using early neutral evaluation (ENE) and arbitration.

Early neutral evaluation

ENE is one of the least well-known methods of ADR. Its purpose is to provide disputing parties with an indication from an independent evaluator of the likely outcome of a dispute. The Commercial and Admiralty Court Guide provides for its use after proceedings have commenced.

Since the purpose of ENE is to give an early view of the likely outcome at trial, it is important that the evaluator is, as far as possible, put in a similar position to that of a trial judge. To achieve this, considerable preparation may be needed although this can be lessened by co-operation between the parties

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

A quick fix or a long battle?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Part 2: Early neutral evaluation or arbitration? Emma Sadler considers the alternatives to litigation

Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) has increased in popularity steadily over the last decade. In part one of this article the merits of mediation and expert determination were discussed (see NLJ, 30 January 2009, p 154). Part two considers the benefits of avoiding litigation by using early neutral evaluation (ENE) and arbitration.

Early neutral evaluation

ENE is one of the least well-known methods of ADR. Its purpose is to provide disputing parties with an indication from an independent evaluator of the likely outcome of a dispute. The Commercial and Admiralty Court Guide provides for its use after proceedings have commenced.

Since the purpose of ENE is to give an early view of the likely outcome at trial, it is important that the evaluator is, as far as possible, put in a similar position to that of a trial judge. To achieve this, considerable preparation may be needed although this can be lessened by co-operation between the parties

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS

NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders

Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners

NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do

A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent

Your magistrates’ court needs you!

Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process

NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed

Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’

NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits

A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’

back-to-top-scroll