header-logo header-logo

A quick fix or a long battle?

29 January 2009 / Emma Sadler
Issue: 7354 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , ADR
printer mail-detail

Part 1: Mediation or expert determination? Emma Sadler considers the alternatives to litigation

Mediation is probably the most well known and widely promoted form of alternative dispute resolution (ADR). It enjoys the support of the courts and promotion by organisations such as the Centre for Effective Dispute Resolution. Some of the commonly accepted advantages of trying to resolve disputes by mediation are: its comparatively low cost; the speed with which a mediation can be arranged; the fact that the decision is consensual and not unilaterally imposed; and the potential confidentiality of both the mediation and any related settlement agreement.

The financial cost of mediation is usually low in comparison to litigation or other forms of ADR. However, it can cause parties to incur unnecessary costs in situations where there is little prospect of a settlement being concluded but they feel unable to refuse mediation outright because of the risk of cost sanctions. Halsey v Milton Keynes General NHS Trust [2004] 1 WLR 3002, [2004] All ER (D) 125 (May) held

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll